Book a demoStart a pilot
Implementation

From kick-off to steady-state operations

A clear path to live: configured from your SOPs, validated as we go, connected to your systems, and measured against your own baseline.

End-to-end automation

One true automation, from start to end

Most safety teams already have some automation. But it is partial: a tool that reads forms here, a bot that codes terms there. vGenix Ai automates the whole case lifecycle as one flow.

Partial automation

Islands of automation

  • Point tools automate one step at a time
  • People re-key data and hand cases between systems
  • Every case still needs manual touches
  • Savings never add up across the lifecycle
vGenix Ai · true automation

One continuous flow

  • Every step automated, in one continuous flow
  • One platform and data model: no re-keying, no hand-offs
  • Zero-touch processing for eligible cases
  • Experts routed only the cases that need judgement
One automated flow→Intake→Triage→Extract→Code→QC→Submit→ACK→ArchiveMedicines · Vaccines · Devices · Cosmetics · Nutrition · Veterinary

Zero-touch lane

Eligible cases flow from intake to E2B (R3) submission and acknowledgement with no manual touch. Eligibility rules, for example non-serious, complete and not a duplicate, are agreed with you and validated before go-live.

Expert lane

Cases that need judgement, such as serious or unexpected events, are routed automatically to the right reviewer, with extraction, coding and checks already done.

MEANINGFUL AUTOMATIONNot islands of automation, but the whole case lifecycle working as one, with humans where risk demands.
How we are different

Automation, compared

What separates meaningful automation from automation in name only.

AreaTypical point-tool automationvGenix Ai
ScopeOne step at a time: intake, or coding, or submissionThe whole lifecycle, from intake to acknowledgement and archive
DataRe-keyed between tools and systemsOne data model shared by every module
Hand-offsPeople move cases between toolsNone: cases flow automatically
Manual touchesEvery case still needs someZero-touch for eligible cases; experts for the rest
RulesGeneric logic you adapt toConfigured from your SOPs, validated and versioned
AIGenerative output reviewed by peopleNeurosymbolic: every answer checked against rules and knowledge
TraceabilityGaps between toolsEvery output linked to its source, in one audit trail
ValidationAfter the build, as a separate projectAs we configure, with evidence from the implementation itself
ProofHeadline percentagesResults measured against your own baseline
How we implement

Four phases to live

Durations depend on scope and are agreed with you during scoping.

1
[__] weeks

Scope & design

  • Modules, domains and markets agreed
  • Current workflows and SOPs mapped
  • Data sources and integrations confirmed
  • Baseline metrics agreed and measured

Deliverables: Project plan · scope document · baseline report

2
[__] weeks

Configure & validate

  • Case rules, coding conventions and thresholds configured
  • Templates, narratives and review gates set up
  • Zero-touch eligibility rules agreed
  • Validation run as each part is configured

Deliverables: Configuration specification · validation evidence

3
[__] weeks

Integrate & onboard

  • Safety database and gateways connected
  • Access, roles and SSO set up
  • Data migration where needed
  • Users trained by role

Deliverables: Integration tests · training records

4
Ongoing

Go live & operate

  • Controlled release, module by module
  • Dashboards from day one
  • Hypercare period after go-live
  • 24/7 support and continuous improvement

Deliverables: Go-live report · results against baseline

PRINCIPLEConfigure before you integrate; validate as you configure.
Start with a pilot

A 6-week pilot on literature monitoring

Prove the value on your own data before you commit to the full platform.

Week 1

Scope and baseline

Agree the literature scope, sources and success measures; measure the current baseline.

Week 2

Configure

Search strategies, screening rules and review gates set up from your SOPs.

Week 3

Validate

Configuration tested and validation evidence produced with your QA team.

Weeks 4–5

Run on live data

vGenix Ai runs alongside your current process on real articles.

Week 6

Measure and decide

Results reported against the baseline, with a recommendation for next steps.

Example plan. The pilot scope and timeline are agreed with you.

Working together

Who does what

AreaYour teamvGenix Ai
Project leadershipProject sponsor and safety leadImplementation lead and project manager
SOPs and rulesProvide SOPs; approve configurationMap SOPs; configure rules, templates and gates
ValidationQA review and approvalValidation approach, test execution and evidence
IntegrationIT access and system ownersConnectors, gateways and data migration
TrainingNominate users and super-usersRole-based training and materials
After go-liveOwn operations and decisionsHypercare, 24/7 support and improvements
After go-live

Support that keeps improving

Hypercare

Close support in the weeks after go-live while your team settles in.

24/7 support

Multi-tier support and a named customer success team.

Results reporting

Regular reports on cycle time, quality and timeliness against your baseline.

Controlled improvement

New rules, modules and AI improvements released under change control.

Next step

Intelligent safety should be one connected operation

Automate the work. Keep the decisions with your experts. Keep the evidence traceable. See it on your own data in six weeks.

Recommended

6-week pilot on literature monitoring

  • Baselines agreed up front
  • Configured to your SOPs
  • Measured on your own data
  • Validation evidence from day one
Start your pilot